WikiFX is a global forex broker, founded in 2018, it has quickly gained popularity among traders worldwide by providing detailed insights such as verification and information to thousands of forex brokers. They collect and analyze data related to broker regulation, licenses, business scope, risk control, and overall credibility. This allows users to verify whether a broker is reliable before investing their money. One of the essential features of WikiFX is its powerful search and rating system. Traders are able to easily look up brokers, check their regulatory status and view risk scores based on multiple factors. The platform is also known for highlighting warnings for potentially unsafe or unregulated brokers and helping users avoid scams.
| Broker Type | Regulatory Inquiries |
| Founded | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Hong Kong |
| Regulations | no regulation |
| Min. Deposit | $0 |
| Max Leverage | Up to 1:2000 |
| Spreads From | 0.0 Pips |
| Platforms | MT4,MT5,Mobile App |
| Instruments | Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Crypto |
| Account Types | Standard Account, Micro/Mini Account, ECN Account, Cent Account |
| Payment Methods | Bank Transfers, E-Wallets & Crypto, Card Payments |
| Customer Support | 24/7 |
| Countries Served | Hong Kong |
| Demo Account | Yes |
β ββββ
Terrible website not real
he platform claims to provide transparent broker ratings, but it often feels like the rankings depend more on which brokers pay them rather than the actual quality or reputation of the broker. Iβve noticed that some questionable brokers are highlighted and promoted, while well-known and established brokers sometimes receive surprisingly low scores. That makes the ratings hard to trust and raises concerns about how objective the system really is. For a website that presents itself as a broker review platform, transparency should be a priority. Unfortunately, the scoring and promotion system doesnβt feel very clear, which makes it difficult to rely on the information provided.
β ββββ
Terrible website not real
he platform claims to provide transparent broker ratings, but it often feels like the rankings depend more on which brokers pay them rather than the actual quality or reputation of the broker. Iβve noticed that some questionable brokers are highlighted and promoted, while well-known and established brokers sometimes receive surprisingly low scores. That makes the ratings hard to trust and raises concerns about how objective the system really is. For a website that presents itself as a broker review platform, transparency should be a priority. Unfortunately, the scoring and promotion system doesnβt feel very clear, which makes it difficult to rely on the information provided.
